Considering that being a woman was 50% of the President's stated qualifications for the position, that's pretty frightening. I'm not sure which possibility is the more terrifying though - that she is too politically motivated to answer honestly (SCOTUS first watchword is apolitical), that she is too afraid to answer honestly (a SCOTUS should never be afraid to speak a simple truth) or that she is actually too ignorant to even know that she herself is a woman. We have to believe the third is simply ridiculous, but either of the other two should immediately disqualify her from consideration, so...
I'd love for someone to explain this for me. How does a judge rule on Title VII and Title IX, how does she protect women from discrimination in the workforce, how does she adjudicate matters of women's health (as we are so frequently told abortion is) when she either doesn't know or refuses to acknowledge what a woman even is?
Also, tell me again about who the 'party of science' is, while you're at it.
I'd love for someone to explain this for me. How does a judge rule on Title VII and Title IX, how does she protect women from discrimination in the workforce, how does she adjudicate matters of women's health (as we are so frequently told abortion is) when she either doesn't know or refuses to acknowledge what a woman even is?
Also, tell me again about who the 'party of science' is, while you're at it.
Last edited:
